|
|
Shidane
Arone’s Case Sparks a Tumultuous Debate
in the Canadian War Museum
By Mohamed M. Bakayr
![](../images/canadian_war_m.jpg) |
Shidane Arone’s body was buried in
his hometown of Beletweyne, but his image
ended up in the Canadian
War Museum. For more than a decade, the
case of Shidane Arone has been a tumultuous
roar among Canadians. In late 1992, about
nine hundred soldiers of the Canadian Airborne
Regiment were dispatched to Somalia. The Regiment’s
mission in Somalia had been to help alleviate
the misery that Somalis were going through
at the time. More specifically, the soldiers’
duty had been to safeguard civilians against
the armed gangs who were roving all over the
places and were killing civilians at random.
At the time, Somalia was engulfed by unscrupulous
civil wars and unprecedented famines. People
were dying by the thousands, but they did
not know what they were dying for or who was
killing them! While bullets were killing some
people, other peoples’ lives were being
taken by hunger and acute malnutrition. At
that desperate time, Canada wanted to help
Somalis in their habitations. However, what
many Somalis cheered for and welcomed turned
into a nightmare. Actually, many victimized
Somalis did not ask for trouble; they needed
a helping hand, but their expectation was
not fulfilled.
Shidane Arone was only 16 years old when
his head was cruelly bashed and his innocent
life was taken by a sadistic soldier who was
sent to Somalia in order to assist civilians,
not to murder them. Unfortunately, Shidane
found himself in the wrong place, what he
thought to be a glimmer of hope proved to
be a deadly end. Hunger drove the poor teenager
to where death lay in wait for him; he approached
the Regiment’s compound, hoping that
he would get some provisions that could extinguish
and quench the fire that hunger was kindling
in his stomach. However, his hope vanished,
and his thirst and hunger transformed into
death, that slow death. As Shidane was being
tortured, he screamed, pled for his life and
called for help, but nobody came to his rescue.
Although his whimper awakened some soldiers
who were sleeping at the time, they did not
salvage the vulnerable boy from death and
did not attend to the matter at all. While
Corporal Clayton Matchee, a member of the
Canadian Airborne Regiment in Beletweyne,
was torturing and murdering Shidane Arone,
Kyle Brown, another solider from the same
regiment, was taking pictures of the unaided
teenager. At that sinister time of March 1993,
Shidane’s soul was separated from its
hunger baked body. To this date, Shidane’s
image portrays the brutal way in which he
had been tortured and murdered.
In 1995, Canada conducted a prolonged inquiry
about Shidane’s miserable death. The
aim of the inquiry was to find out what went
awry and the circumstances that surrounded
the death of the innocent youth. However,
I am not in a position here to unravel the
findings of the inquiry or how it was concluded.
I spare the details of this case for other
fellow contributors who might be willing to
stretch out the case and elaborate on it a
bit more.
A new Canadian War Museum was opened on
May 8, 2005. Many Canadians across the country
celebrated the official opening of the new
Canadian War Museum in Ottawa. The opening
marked the 60th anniversary of victory in
Europe. The mission of the Museum, as Canada’s
prime Minster put it, is “to honour
all those brave men and women, who have lived
through wars, both overseas and on the home
front, by sharing their stories with future
generations.” The Museum holds thousands
of assorted artifacts. Of these artifacts,
though, there is one piece of artifact that
has stood out and has enraged some Canadians;
it is the picture of Shidane Arone.
On the one hand, there are Canadians who
are averse to the inclusion of Shidane’s
portraits in the Museum’s collection;
the opponents argue that such a portrait mortifies
and degrades the reputation of the Canadian
military, for the image shows the blood soaked
head of the helpless boy being bashed and
squashed by a Canadian soldier. For instance,
Cliff Chadderton, a war veteran who chairs
the National Council of Veterans, was infuriated
by the inclusion of Shidane Arone’s
paintings in the Museum. The veteran condemned
the portrait and threatened to boycott the
Museum’s ceremonial opening altogether.
As he says, the portrait is embarrassing and
does not bring any integrity to the country.
To him, “ the paintings are a trashy,
insulting tribute and should not be part of
a Museum honouring Canada’s military
heritage.” Another Canadian comments
on Shidane’s portrait and says, “One
of the first images to confront visitors when
they enter the new Canadian War Museum is
not about war but about shame.”
On the other hand, there are other Canadians
who disagree with Mr. Chadderton on the whole
issue. They are of the opinion that Shidane
Arone’s paintings are as good as any
other war artifacts in the Museum. After all,
Shidane’s paintings tell their side
of the story; they portray how the poor boy
was tormented and murdered by a sadistic solider
who was paid and sustained by Canadian taxpayers
in order to convey the country’s values
and justice to unstable parts of the world.
Hence, the advocates argue that it is not
Shidane’s image that lowers the reputation
of the Canadian military, but it is the barbaric
actions of the Canadian solider who murdered
the blameless boy. The murderer shuttered
the future and stability of Shidane’s
parents and at the same time belittled Canada’s
heritage and values. Here, Dr. Laura Brandon,
the Museum’s curator of war art, is
adamant about keeping Shidane’s paintings
in the Museums. In the words of Dr. Brandon,
“ It is part of Canada’s military
history. We are a military history Museum:
our job is to tell… military history,
warts and all.”
Shidane Arone’s case has sparked a
tumultuous debate in the Canadian War Museum.
When one sees the victim’s image in
the media, one gets sick and saddened. The
image speaks for itself. A Canadian soldier
inhumanely victimized the boy in his hometown
of Beletweyne, Hiiraan, Somalia, in 1993.
While Some Canadians say the portrait should
be excluded from the Museum’s collection,
other Canadians say the portrait ought to
be part of the Museum’s holdings.
Mohamed M. Bakayr
E-mail: [email protected]
The opinions contained in this
article are solely those of the writer,
and in no way, form or shape represent
the editorial opinions of "Hiiraan
Online" |
|
|
|